Well, as far as learning how they were able to raise funding, it was a bit baffling. However, I’m reminded that venture capitalist not only like to invest in good ideas but most importantly great people because they are tend to be adaptable. They are able to adjust or evolve their business model to ultimately be profitable which is what VCs are all about. Not sure what kind of evolution process most of these business models experience went but it would be great to know in helping to determine how they were able to capture funding. My big take away from this article is that all startups don’t have to the disruption technology ingredient in order to get financial support.
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Top 20 Innovative Tech Startups – ETR 500 Week 11 Blog
After reviewing the article on the top 20 innovative tech startups, I was a bit startled that there weren’t more if any that could be considered disruptive technology. I would even say there weren’t any at all. The list in my opinion didn’t feature much innovation by these startups. Most of these companies’ ventures seem to display themes of which are building on ones that currently exist within the marketplace. I wasn’t very impressed by the choices on the list. Not to say that I would have been able to do better but for companies that got venture capitalist (VC) to invest millions, I was expecting more. I like the ZocDoc concept of booking your doctor’s appointment online but once again this is not disruptive technology, setting appointments online is not new. The article did show startups that found a gap or underserve market such as Roundtable. All blogging sites are one way communication and Roundtable offers the opposite.
Friday, November 11, 2011
Sloan Management Review Article - ETR 500 Week 10 Blog
Consumers as they say are now “taking the bull by the horns” and are becoming an intricate part of the product innovation process despite what some businesses would like to think. Consumers are in a position of power and have the final say so as to whether or not a product will be successful. The field of dreams concept that has dominate the industries for decades of, “build it and they will come” is diminishing. Only few companies such as Apple are still successful using that concept and they too have tweaked it with the consumer in mind. Consumers are now taking a manufacturer product and augmenting it fit their needs a lot better or upgrading it to a more effective product.
Technology advancement couple with consumer’s curiosity has seen the evolution of the product innovation process. The internet and the advancement of science have put the consumer smack in the middle of the invention cycle. These consumers are creating, prototyping and executing product testing on their own. Consumers are no longer waiting for the manufacturers to provide them with products that they need or having the OEMs assume what a consumer will need. The consumer is now taking the lead and entering the market place themselves as entrepreneurs or seeking the manufacturers out with their own product innovations. Over the last few decades entrepreneurship has seen rapid growth because consumers are successfully developing their own product ideas. Larger more establish companies are now acquiring smaller entities that evolved through the entrepreneurship process and are saving those large businesses some R&D funding. Some entrepreneurs are utilizing the process of selling their company or product idea an exit strategy such as what John Osher did with Porter & Gamble and his SpinBrush product idea. The R&D process is a critical and expensive area for more established companies looking to maintain or grow their market share. A few of these businesses are now seeking consumer inputs as a part of their market research process and as a way to improve their product design.
Going forward the future looks very bright for those consumers that have an excellent product idea and for those folks that are in the business of entrepreneurship. However, all this is based on the thought the all these entities has a product that is marketable and has profitability tied to it. Not every great idea can be marketed but for those (consumers) who can find the gap(s) within the market place by developing a products such as the SpinBrush then good things are on the horizon.
Technology advancement couple with consumer’s curiosity has seen the evolution of the product innovation process. The internet and the advancement of science have put the consumer smack in the middle of the invention cycle. These consumers are creating, prototyping and executing product testing on their own. Consumers are no longer waiting for the manufacturers to provide them with products that they need or having the OEMs assume what a consumer will need. The consumer is now taking the lead and entering the market place themselves as entrepreneurs or seeking the manufacturers out with their own product innovations. Over the last few decades entrepreneurship has seen rapid growth because consumers are successfully developing their own product ideas. Larger more establish companies are now acquiring smaller entities that evolved through the entrepreneurship process and are saving those large businesses some R&D funding. Some entrepreneurs are utilizing the process of selling their company or product idea an exit strategy such as what John Osher did with Porter & Gamble and his SpinBrush product idea. The R&D process is a critical and expensive area for more established companies looking to maintain or grow their market share. A few of these businesses are now seeking consumer inputs as a part of their market research process and as a way to improve their product design.
Going forward the future looks very bright for those consumers that have an excellent product idea and for those folks that are in the business of entrepreneurship. However, all this is based on the thought the all these entities has a product that is marketable and has profitability tied to it. Not every great idea can be marketed but for those (consumers) who can find the gap(s) within the market place by developing a products such as the SpinBrush then good things are on the horizon.
Sunday, October 30, 2011
Leadership Style - ETR 500 Week 8 Blog
I find that I my decisions are based on the facts and insights from my team members. When it comes to making the tough choices, I want as much information as I can process in deriving an answer. Which is why, I prefer to provide my team with necessities they required to execute their daily dues. I do believe that you should you should surround yourself with talented people and step out of the way in order for progress to be made.
Based on the chapter 12 four categories of leadership styles, I display more of a delegating technique. I prefer to foster the talents of my team in achieving a deliverable. However, this does not mean that I do not also incorporate the other styles depending on what is required in meeting the goal at hand. In the text, it indicates that the best leaders are those that are able to utilize all four categories effectively and as required. I do agree with that assessment and although, I do believe I am a work in progress as which is why I am seeking my MBA. I do imply each of those styles (supporting, coaching, delegating and directing); however, I think that finding the balance is my challenge going forward.
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Product Innovation Challenges - ETR 500 Week 6 Blog
Production innovation will always come with its own set of challenges whether they are internal or external to the company it almost a rite of passage. This article explains the leading cause of most product innovation not living up to their expectations is due to “lack of product differentiation and poor market analysis.” Furthermore, the driving force to those causes were that most of those organizations resources were spread thin with too many development projects in process on at the same time. Well, it isn’t too surprising that management seem to be driving the focus on too many things at once or even detracting the required resources from the products and areas that could be of some real benefit to their companies. These echoes seem to get louder and louder which is why a few companies tends to loss some of its market share to others because either the competition has caught up or they have taken the next step forward.
Whether more product innovation tends to fail more often than they succeed, it is the path to success. The reason as to why products such as the IPod/ITunes work is simply due to the fact that leaders like Steve Jobs celebrate failures on the path to success. Failures are used as stepping stones in achieving their ultimate goal(s). Apple went after the music industry which at the time saw its profit margin diminishing with each illegal download. Apple stepped in with the IPod/ITunes package and offered ITunes as the intermediary solution to music piracy.
Monday, October 3, 2011
Outbound vs Inbound - ETR 500 Week 5 Blog
Inbounding is considered the new way of marketing. In today’s culture most businesses are moving to if not already utilizes the Inbounding marketing strategy as a way to respond to customer evolving purchasing habits. The key for inbounding is that it relies on customers seeking them out through marketing mediums such as blogging, search engines, YouTube, Facebook, etc. For an entrepreneur this is the most cost effective way in which to reach out to their customer base and even grow the business.
Outbound is the opposite of Inbounding. It is the known as the traditional or the old way of marketing, "buy, beg, or bug their way in". This was often done through the process of paying for advertising, flyers, telemarketing/cold calling, etc. This was the equivalent of casting a wide net with the hopes of reaching all consumers. This is in contrast to the inbounding which identifies a target audience in trying to capture market share.
I think it would be very difficult in today’s way of business execution to survive by not incorporating the inbound along with outbound marketing. Larger companies such as the Wal-Mart can pursue both avenues but it is a bit more difficult for the mom and pop businesses. They may need to focus their efforts on the inbound marketing because it is more financially beneficial.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Apple’s iPod/iTunes Business Model - ETR 500 Week 4
The IPod/ITunes business model isn’t new but what Apple has tapped into is a market that needed an overhaul. Apple also isn’t the first company to sell you one product by lowering fees and then try to entice the customer into acquiring additional but more expensive product. It’s a blueprint that has been implemented within many different markets. The thing that Apple did with both the IPod and ITunes was appeal to both producers (music industry) as well as the customer base while reaping some huge financial benefits.
The Apple concept of offering the ITunes software for free to subscribers and owners of the IPod allowed them the ability to create a one stop shop store for music and Apple product upgrade. By partnering with an industry that was seeing its profit margin decline at alarming rate as a result of other websites ability to download their music for free, Apple saw ITunes as the prefect intermediary to the music industry and growing its IPod product line. The decision to charge a nominal fee to customers wanting to download a variety of hand-picked music as oppose to buying an entire CD was the bases for the music industry to stop their financial bleeding. Apple was not only able to integrate the ITunes with their growing selection of IPod models but it was also able to include other products such the IPhone. ITunes started as a music store and has increased offerings of movies, videos, television episodes, games and apps which are only compatible with certain Apple products.
Thursday, September 15, 2011
A Review of Michael E. Porter's Strategy and the Internet
Michael Porter’s five forces analysis as it pertains to the internet’s influence on industry structure within the article “Strategy and the Internet” continues to provide excellent thought provoking points. The internet is a powerful tool that when utilized correctly can aide a company in delivering its core competencies to the market place and build on its current customer base. “Integrate Internet initiatives into your company’s overall strategy and operations so that 1) complements, rather than cannibalize, your established competitive approaches and 2) create systemic advantages that your competitors can’t copy.”¹ The internet has become far more important business tool that many have initial thought. In reviewing Porter’s five forces, the internet has help to change in some respect the landscape of the way business is done but it hasn’t rendered the five principles obsolete. In fact it has help to reinforce its vitality in the market place influences.
The internet has lowered the barriers to entry standards in most markets allowing many who may not otherwise be able to gain access due to lack of finance to acquire physical assets, sales force and general access to channels such those located globally. As more and more companies enter the market, the price of the products and services can be affected. Another byproduct of that effect is also the quality of said products and services. All these effects makes things somewhat challenging for brick and mortar business that have been well established but not as difficult as the keeping applications that are a part of the internet proprietary.
Efficiency is another positive which the market place has seen as a result of the internet and it has also allowed for its expansion. Sometimes there is a bit of bad that comes along with the good and in this case it is the threat of substitutes. With the growth potential of this new tool has brought with it imitation services and products from new and unassuming companies.
One of the areas the internet has intensified is in rivalry among existing competitors. It has widened the demographics of the competitive bases globally and has made pricing an essential requirement. It has also allowed the gap between them to close by reducing the differences between their products. The competition on price is not what most company’s desire because it lowers the profit margins by reducing variable cost.
The supply base has also felt the effects of the internet. It provides better access to most suppliers and the ability to gather real time data that can help to enhance their business. The procurement process has translated into bargain power over suppliers as well as allowed for them cut of the middle man and reach the customers themselves.
Buyers have seen their bargain power increase as a result of the internet.
The internet may have initially leveled the playing field to the market place but it’s those companies that choose to maximize its abilities that will differentiate them from the competition. The internet is just another way for companies to reach its customers, suppliers and promote its business.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
